FanOfTheMan
Member
Love Our Guy!
Posts: 4,205
Location:
|
Post by FanOfTheMan on May 15, 2011 20:14:11 GMT -5
Ethical question for all ATopers currently online. These pics are not from paps but from someone attending a PRIVATE party. I seriously doubt that they were intended to be leaked to the public. Therefore, on principle, should we remove them from our thread? Yes, I know the argument that they are all over the twitterverse by this point. There is no taking them back. Anyone wanting to find them can. And, someone out there will think they have figured out where this house is. And if it is Adam's he will be stalked. We at ATop cannot control that. Just asking if we, out of respect for Adam's privacy, should take the pictures down? By posting them are we passively condoning this invasion of privacy? No, Adam will never know that we oggled over them. But, isn't the measure of character what one does when confident no one will witness it? Don't mean to rain on anybody's parade, but this is on my mind. personal opinion but private pictures should never be posted here. Out of respect for what little bit of privacy Adam has I think they should be taken down. I agree. He has such a precious little bit of privacy as it is. Sad. |
|
NoAngel
Member
Take a bow, Adam Lambert, you fucking legend.
Posts: 2,575
Location:
|
Post by NoAngel on May 15, 2011 20:14:53 GMT -5
Hi Cassie, just got online, but seems consensus is to remove the pics unless we have some knowledge that they are for public consumption. ITA.
|
|
|
|
Post by PastaBaby on May 15, 2011 20:16:15 GMT -5
I don't think we should take the pix down. If they are out there perhaps Adam should know about it.
edit: I don't understand FB. How can you get a picture if it is a private picture?
|
|
|
|
Post by cassie on May 15, 2011 20:16:53 GMT -5
Well, I took my pic down, just in case. Just to be clear, though. If these were on a public FB I would feel no qualms about posting it here. Thanks, aloha. That shows character. I don't really understand public FB. I know that theoretically, anything I post on FB can be seen by others who can pass it on to others, but, it has such an appearance of being limited to your immediate friends that I think people post things on there they would never want to become widely distributed to strangers. I don't post anything on FB that I would have a problem with anyone seeing, including telling when and where I am vacationing in case my house gets robbed while I am gone. But, my students post remarkably personal things there. Just sayin'. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2011 20:18:10 GMT -5
Why would Danielle post pics of Adam's house on her FB page that tons of fans can access because she has friended them? I'm going with "not Adam's hhouse."
|
|
|
|
Post by crazyoldgal on May 15, 2011 20:18:11 GMT -5
Heavens, we just had a hail storm w/ ice balls the size of ping pong balls...I've never the dogs run up stairs so fast except for the puppy, she stood at the patio door just looking. no fear
I'm not crazy about looking into someone's private affair, but if someone posted on FB, how private can they be?
Damn, not enough close up of his arms, I'm dying to see if the tatoo sleeve has been started.
Lynne, I like the piano keyboard as my son has an Italian cross which looks like a hugh penis which drive me nuts. It's just awful.
My problem with tatoo's is what if one gets tired of the design, one is stuck with the design I guess until you get it lazered off which I hear is painful. I guess I change my mind to often, to keep anything permanent.
|
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on May 15, 2011 20:20:19 GMT -5
In what times zone is this *%$#&*@ poll over?! I wasn't going to vote anymore but I don't like it when other fantards try to gang up on Adam! >:( Should be over at midnight Eastern or 9PM PCT. About three hours! Thanks. Adam 50.49
Archie 49.54 |
|
|
|
Post by SusieFierce on May 15, 2011 20:21:30 GMT -5
Well, I took my pic down, just in case. Just to be clear, though. If these were on a public FB I would feel no qualms about posting it here. Thanks, aloha. That shows character. I don't really understand public FB. I know that theoretically, anything I post on FB can be seen by others who can pass it on to others, but, it has such an appearance of being limited to your immediate friends that I think people post things on there they would never want to become widely distributed to strangers. I don't post anything on FB that I would have a problem with anyone seeing, including telling when and where I am vacationing in case my house gets robbed while I am gone. But, my students post remarkably personal things there. Just sayin'. The thing is, things DO often get posted way before anyone can figure out where they originated and by the time you can track it back, it's too late. The genie is out of the bottle. Sure, we can take them down in an attempt not to condone and I'm totally on board with that, but in the long run, I don't know if it will change anything. |
|
NoAngel
Member
Take a bow, Adam Lambert, you fucking legend.
Posts: 2,575
Location:
|
Post by NoAngel on May 15, 2011 20:21:47 GMT -5
I deleted the pics. Just feels uncomfortable to have pics here from a source that is not meant to be public. Best I can tell, it's a friend of Danielle's who posted them and tagged Danielle, so they appeared on her wall. I don't think friends of Adam's friends would necessarily be savvy to the ways of the ninjas. As for Adam knowing about them, I'm sure there are plenty of fans who will tweet them to him, so he has no need to look for them here...  |
|
needacoke
Member
@needacoke
Posts: 1,152
Location:
|
Post by needacoke on May 15, 2011 20:22:03 GMT -5
Why would Danielle post pics of Adam's house on her FB page that tons of fans can access because she has friended them? I'm going with "not Adam's hhouse." I just looked at Danielle's FB page. She didn't post the pics there. They are from Stephanie Moeller's album and she tagged Danielle in the pics and that's how they showed up on Danielle's page. There are a couple more that weren't posted here. |
|
