dotsgirl02
Member
Now have a 2 year old male rescue named Remy.
Posts: 521
Location:
|
Post by dotsgirl02 on Apr 19, 2016 11:45:57 GMT -5
I will never not be annoyed with the hotel stalking! MTE
|
|
|
Post by bamafan on Apr 19, 2016 11:46:15 GMT -5
I love my M&G pic. A full body shot would be nice but the area was cramped, so I think that is why. But heads would roll if the entire album from LA was made public! :( I guess Moscow didn't use a private link though. I seem to recall all the M&G's for Moscow were only for contest winners. That may be why they did a more comprehensive photo session. Yes, you're right. These weren't paid photo ops...but M&G winners, so that probably explains it. Seems here in US winners pics are often, not always, posted for the public.
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Apr 19, 2016 12:10:06 GMT -5
I feel so bad for these two women. Treatment like that should be rectified immediately.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2016 12:20:05 GMT -5
That is his publist at work, at least she is making an attempt to keep his name out there. He isn't going to reveal anything this early but does imply that he might work with MM again. Just happy that this one sounds more positive about another album that the article last week did. He's said "work on new music in the Fall" several times recently. Guess I missed the one that didn't sound encouraging! Considering how little time he ever takes off, I figure a short vacation, then back to work. By back to work, I mean working on music, not concerts. WBR will not let him go 3 years between albums, IMO! So many thing factored into the delays of albums #2 & 3! It was the Rolling Stone interview and the wording just struck me as very iffy. 'A new solo album isn't in the cards just yet. Maybe at the end of the year, he says. "When I have a whole break and I can just be home for a little while, I'd like to start working on some new music if I can.' www.billboard.com/articles/news/7326406/adam-lambert-american-idol-finale-rocky-horror-interview
|
|
|
Post by mszue on Apr 19, 2016 12:47:19 GMT -5
Come on guys...let's not get carried away here....we have had pictures of the interior of Adam's house lifted from MLS and realtor's sites, pics blown up of the closest details...types of candles....analyses of pretty much every item of clothing he owns, sight seeing of his home is pretty standard I expect...and then we beat up on some peeps for geo-sleuthing his hotel and waiting for him to exit.... Not saying Adam does not have a right to object....he certainly does...but we don't. Seriously.....
|
|
|
Post by bamafan on Apr 19, 2016 12:47:47 GMT -5
I feel so bad for these two women. Treatment like that should be rectified immediately. At least all the finger pointing is at the venue...not Adam or Adam fans. Wonder where they found that dude's pic they used in the article. lol Maybe it's a good thing it's some unknown dude. This is a tabloid and I imagine it might have been embellished a little. They said they were "put on this balcony like 40-50 feet away from the stage with a dirty scratcy screen, etc...Seems like they should have known or inquired when they filled out a form where they would be located. Rude comments and everything else aside,,...being stuck behind a dirty, scratchy screen would have pissed me off.
|
|
|
Post by Craazyforadam on Apr 19, 2016 13:06:24 GMT -5
What the Mirror reports here is not the only report about the conditions for special needs people during that concert. There was a post two days ago on twitter, linking to a Facebook post, telling an horrific story, and it basically matches the details given here. I just don't know for sure anymore who wrote it. I think it was by someone connected to the Lambrits account or facebook page. Does anyone here remember reading this on twitter and/or knows more detail? In there, it reported that some people had a completely obstructed view, others were stuck behind that dirty screen that is also described here. He also reported that basic safety was a problem, i.e. the only access that balcony was a small elevator, allowing one wheelchair at a time. In a fire emergency, there seemed no way out. Also, there was insufficient personnel, especially nobody to assist people. People had to hand over their water bottles, leaving them unable to take their medications. No access to the bar, neither to restrooms. Later, one usher must have brought some water, but still, this all sounds unacceptable for a public venue in the UK. I hope, the Mirror stays on this story, because even if nothing can be done for the people at Adam's concert, it sure seems like this situation needs to be remedied going forward. ====================================== ETA: Here we go - just found it: scroll down to post #60 by Welsh Fleur forum.adamofficial.com/topic/63253-toh-tour-manchester-uk-at-academy-1-4162016/page-3
|
|
|
Post by cassie on Apr 19, 2016 13:07:35 GMT -5
Come on guys...let's not get carried away here....we have had pictures of the interior of Adam's house lifted from MLS and realtor's sites, pics blown up of the closest details...types of candles....analyses of pretty much every item of clothing he owns, sight seeing of his home is pretty standard I expect...and then we beat up on some peeps for geo-sleuthing his hotel and waiting for him to exit.... Not saying Adam does not have a right to object....he certainly does...but we don't. Seriously..... Well, he kinda did say something by retweeting that Tyler comment about stalking, didn't he? Adam is between a rock and a hard place, IMO. After his reputation for being the best voice in the industry, his second-biggest reputation may be how nice he is: to people he works with, to the press, to interviewers, and to his fans. While it may his nature to be so sweet, I think he works hard at it, too, at times. He may think that the media storm that would occur if he said anything to his fans about boundaries and privacy would be worse than just grinning and bearing it. I don't know that anyone was "beating up" fans for sleuthing. Just commenting and questioning. Perhaps there should be discussions about personal vs professional, private vs. public, available - albeit thru sleuthing in person or online - vs. respectful. It seems to me that our need to know everything about everything Adam related should not supersede Adam's and his friends' rights to privacy. When in doubt as to what is appropriate, we would never be wrong by erring on the side of caution. If we question whether it is intrusive, it probably is. If we think that we would be upset if someone did something similar to us instead of a star, that probably means "don't."
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2016 13:48:09 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2016 14:03:31 GMT -5
Come on guys...let's not get carried away here....we have had pictures of the interior of Adam's house lifted from MLS and realtor's sites, pics blown up of the closest details...types of candles....analyses of pretty much every item of clothing he owns, sight seeing of his home is pretty standard I expect...and then we beat up on some peeps for geo-sleuthing his hotel and waiting for him to exit.... Not saying Adam does not have a right to object....he certainly does...but we don't. Seriously..... Well, he kinda did say something by retweeting that Tyler comment about stalking, didn't he? Adam is between a rock and a hard place, IMO. After his reputation for being the best voice in the industry, his second-biggest reputation may be how nice he is: to people he works with, to the press, to interviewers, and to his fans. While it may his nature to be so sweet, I think he works hard at it, too, at times. He may think that the media storm that would occur if he said anything to his fans about boundaries and privacy would be worse than just grinning and bearing it. I don't know that anyone was "beating up" fans for sleuthing. Just commenting and questioning. Perhaps there should be discussions about personal vs professional, private vs. public, available - albeit thru sleuthing in person or online - vs. respectful. It seems to me that our need to know everything about everything Adam related should not supersede Adam's and his friends' rights to privacy. When in doubt as to what is appropriate, we would never be wrong by erring on the side of caution. If we question whether it is intrusive, it probably is. If we think that we would be upset if someone did something similar to us instead of a star, that probably means "don't." I remember an interview, oh so long ago, where Adam was talking about stuff like this. His comment and I paraphrase, is what he considered a star is: "Someone you wanted to see pics of, know about what they were doing and interest in their life." While I do think Adam is one if the nicest people out there, I think he considers this fan stuff part of his job and an indicator of his popularity. Not to say it doesn't irritate him sometimes, especially when lines are crossed, but he would also be concerned if it not happen.
|
|